The Savior Generals: How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars That Were Lost - From Ancient Greece to Iraq [Kindle Edition] Author: Victor Davis Hanson | Language: English | ISBN:
B00CHHTJBK | Format: PDF, EPUB
The Savior Generals: How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars That Were Lost - From Ancient Greece to Iraq Free PDF
Posts about Download The Book The Savior Generals: How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars That Were Lost - From Ancient Greece to Iraq [Kindle Edition] Free PDF for everyone book with Mediafire Link Download Link Prominent military historian Victor Davis Hanson explores the nature of leadership with his usual depth and vivid prose in The Savior Generals, a set of brilliantly executed pocket biographies of five generals (Themistocles, Belisarius, William Tecumseh Sherman, Matthew Ridgway, and David Petraeus)who single-handedly saved their nations from defeat in war. War is rarely a predictable enterprise—it is a mess of luck, chance, and incalculable variables. Today’s sure winner can easily become tomorrow’s doomed loser. Sudden, sharp changes in fortune can reverse the course of war.
These intractable circumstances are sometimes mastered by leaders of genius—asked at the eleventh hour to save a hopeless conflict, one created by others and frequently unpopular politically and with the public. The savior generals often come from outside the established power structure, employ radical strategies, and flame out quickly. Their careers regularly end in controversy. But their dramatic feats of leadership are vital slices of history—not merely as stirring military narrative, but as lessons on the dynamic nature of consensus, leadership, and destiny. Direct download links available for The Savior Generals: How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars That Were Lost - From Ancient Greece to Iraq Free PDF
- File Size: 1086 KB
- Print Length: 320 pages
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Press; 1 edition (May 14, 2013)
- Sold by: Amazon Digital Services, Inc.
- Language: English
- ASIN: B00CHHTJBK
- Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:
- Lending: Enabled
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #83,968 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
VDH is one of the great historians of his generation.
He won the Presidential Humanities Award in 2007 and the Bradley Prize in 2008 but neither is mentioned on the book jacket. VDH is humble just like the subjects of his book.
More impressive than the volume of his output (he writes multiple columns per week) is the breadth and depth of his knowledge and analysis.
To my mind, the real challenge of any military historian is not getting bogged down in too many details but still giving the reader enough details. VDH excels there.
The generals selected by VDH were the right choices. The all had some common characteristics that were true over the centuries. Most interesting to me was General Ridgeway as I (probably like most Americans) knew nothing about him. He inherited a dire situation in Korea and turned it around in 100 days. Think about that for a second. No South Korea and the Kim family running the whole show for a bigger populace. An entirely different consumer electronics industry throughout Asia. What does the auto industry look like without a South Korea?
"Uncle Billy" Sherman is widely misunderstood and under appreciated. The South could more or less stomach the death and injury, but when the property of the plantation owners was destroyed; well, that's something entirely diffferent. Burning Atlanta destroyed the transportation hub and the march to the sea destroyed the South's will to win.
And consider this VDH item: Lincoln well could have lost the electoral college vote but for Sherman's capturing Atlanta. If Lincoln lost the election, we'd have two (or maybe four) republics instead of one United States.
The concluding chapter is great.
...
...The author has impressive credentials... he has written many books that set the standard. But something happened here. The problem isn't that he left out Patton (he has covered Patton elsewhere and while he turned around a front, he did not turn around a war.) The choice of Sherman is not a problem... Sherman doubtless saved the Union from throwing in the towel.
...No, the problem is that in the piece on Ridgway there are many errors that should not have been made by anybody who has read at least one history of the Korean War. Why these errors made it into print baffles me.
...The author (as observed in another review) includes Eisenhower as a four star general in a group... then specifically lists MacArthur as only having four. Worse, he lists Ned Almond as a "Marine General..." Anybody who has read anything about the Inchon-Chosin Reservoir period knows that he was an Army General who had a single Marine divison attached to his Corps command. There was bad blood, and calling Almond a "Marine General" would be like calling Bin Laden an "Israeli..." None of the parties would have been able to stomach it.
...The author implies that Almond's Corps was a Marine organization. He wildly asserts that the lack of communication and coordination between X Corps and Eighth Army was because of Marine/Army differences. This is the kind of mistake that one would expect of a college freshman. How could this happen?
...There are supposed to be safeguards to prevent something like this from happening. The publisher is not only supposed to have the work checked for highly improbable grammar and syntax, but read by somebody with at least a basic grounding in the field to catch "howlers..." Did this not happen?
...
Book Preview
The Savior Generals: How Five Great Commanders Saved Wars That Were Lost - From Ancient Greece to Iraq Download
Please Wait...